Allenby Recreation Ground, Waterloo, Poole
Young people & residents consultation, 2009
|
27th May |
PHP Fun Day, Waterloo Community Centre 25 young people aged 7-14 consulted [findings] |
||||
|
11th June |
Hillbourne School Council meeting Process agreed and Questionnaires emailed to the school for the own adaptation and distribution to 8-13 yr olds, and collation by the School Council. We were invited back on Thursday 25th June for an update and then will return at the end of term to look at Leisure Services proposals. They would like to be involved in the process from now until the launch. A letter was sent home with all pupils advising the date of the 1st park visit. |
||||
|
22nd June |
First visit to the play area [findings] |
||||
|
25th June |
School Council meeting - update & feedback from representatives [findings] |
||||
|
9th July |
School Council meeting - prioritisation & ranking |
||||
|
10th August |
No comments/requests received from local residents since door-to-door leaflet distribution in July |
||||
|
Follow-up: |
|||||
|
14th Aug |
Revisited play area to share information and progress |
||||
|
8th Oct |
Hillbourne School Council with plans for the improved play area |
||||
|
Hillbourne School Council will help plan site visits by pupils during installation, and help with Playbuilder Year 2 consultations. |
|||||
|
Wednesday 27th May 2009 12 boys aged 7-14 yrs, 13 girls aged 9-13 yrs The majority of children who spoke to us told us that Gough Crescent is the park that they visit the most due to the fact that they all live within walking distance from it. The following parks were mentioned as favourites:
There was a strong feeling that this park needed a complete overhaul for all ages and several parents felt very strongly that not only does the equipment for ages 8-13 need replacing but facilities for under 8’s and also for teenagers. Concern was expressed about the older teenagers misusing the equipment and maintenance issues raised. Those in the 8-13 age range talked about bullying experienced within the park and expressed fear of playing there. However, although most felt it needs improvement the preference is for small basic equipment, or the existing equipment to be re-painted. Most of the young people want to keep the swings but want them made so the older teenagers could not throw them over the top bar. With encouragement the following ideas were suggested (most liked the idea of metal rather than wooden equipment): |
|||||
|
Findings from the play area visit Monday 22nd June 2009 14 boys aged 6-14 yrs, 7 girls aged 7-10 yrs During this site visit most of the young people had come down after hearing about it at school. Gough Crescent (because of the football space and can ride bikes) was named the most as the favourite park. Other favourite parks were:
All of those we spoke to said that Gough Crescent was the one they visited most as it was close to their homes. As the fun day had raised the issue of young people feeling unsafe in the park we included a question about safety. Most said they felt safe if with friends but since the shops had made changes to stop older teenagers hanging around there were more in the park which was a bit scary. The swings were mentioned the most as the piece of equipment those we spoke to would like to keep. Other things that were mentioned included:
Ideas for change and additional pieces of equipment included:
|
|||||
|
Hillbourne
School consultation At all venues we had asked the same questions: What is your favourite park, and why? What is the park you visit most, and why? What would you like to keep in Gough Crescent Park? What would you like to add / change? At our meeting with Hillbourne school on 11th June they proposed a few changes to the draft questionnaire and consultation was led by the school council. We returned on 25th June when the council presented their findings, which included we keep but update the swings & slide, and add:
At a third meeting on 9th July we facilitated a session to develop key priorities from the initial consultation. In small groups they were asked to go through the report and draw out the 3 main additions to the park. These were shared and a common 6 were agreed; the council then participated in a matrix ranking process to prioritise them:
It was suggested items 5 and 6 could be combined into a rebound wall, positioned outside the fenced area, on the opposite side of the footpath.
The pupils then designed how these pieces of equipment would fit within Gough Crescent play area and developed the wording of thanks for the signs at the park.
Pupils agreed to be
involved in Year 2 consultations about the other parks near
the
|
|||||
%20copy_sm.jpg)


